A retirement number that had never actually been calculated
A couple in their mid-career years, 45 — Auckland, New Zealand
The situation
A rough sense of "we should be saving more for retirement" with no actual target number, current trajectory, or gap calculated — the retirement plan existed as a feeling, not a figure.
The approach
Set a concrete target retirement income and horizon, and let the projected-corpus and required-corpus figures do the comparing instead of a vague instinct. Ran a downside scenario (a lower assumed return) alongside the base case to see how much the gap widened under a more conservative assumption.
The outcome
Found the base-case trajectory was closer to on-track than expected, but the conservative scenario showed a real gap — prompting a specific, calculated increase to the monthly contribution rather than an open-ended "save more" resolution.
Tools used
- Goal planning
- Scenario comparison (conservative/base/optimistic)